Dear Mr. Bertelsen,
Somehow, by mistake, this message was forwarded to me. I'll cc: it to the intended recipient.
Have a nice day!
Sincerely,
Ivan
---------- > From: Lars Bertelsen <lbe @
login .
dknet .
dk> > To: firewalls @
GreatCircle .
COM > Subject: Re: PIX and other "Black boxes" vs normal firewalls. > Date: Saturday, October 11, 1997 1:06 AM > > In your message you write: > > >I am relativly new to firewalls (I have set up several with the TIS fwtk and > >managed some others) and I am running into management that is saying we > >need to > >replace the Unix based firewalls with "black-box" firewalls (the CISCO PIX > >being > >used as an example). I would like to get info from both sides of the issue > >before deciding which way to jump. > > > >Current arguments are. > > > >1. black-boxes are more secure as they do not run Unix which everyone > >knows and > >which has unknown security holes in it. > > > Black boxes may have holes in them too. Blackboxes run off software and > software has bugs! > Cisco have made many bugfixes to their operating system over time. > Oh, and Cisco's run on a small unix or very unix-like OS! > The difference between Unix based firewalls and blackboxes in this respect > is that if a blackbox has a hole in it, only the manufacturer can confirm > and fix it. It is not that holes aren't existant! > > Oh, and Unix doesn't have security holes as far as I know... Certain > servers running under Unix have security holes, but that is something > entirely different. Don't run anything on your Unix boxwhich isn't both > safe and necessary! > That way Unix is safe. > > > >2. black-boxes require less time to manage reducing the need for > >firewall/security staff. > No comment. I haven't set up a Cisco PIX. > But I would assume that if it does as many things as a Unix based firewall > the it will take roughly as much setup and maintainence. > A router takes less setup than an application-firewall because it only does > one thing: Filter on packets. > > > > > >3. Unix based firewalls are more flexable as they can be tailored to the > >specific application better then what the "black-box" designers decided was > >needed. > True. You can install and deinstall just what you want on a Unix box. > > Which sort og introduces : > 4) Blackboxes are safer in inexperienced hands because you _can't_ change > so much about them! > > > Lars Bertelsen > Gartnervang 29 tlf. 4635 1115 > 4000 Roskilde, DK e-mail of choice: lbe @
login .
dknet .
dk >
|