Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(October 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: [FW1] Re: Virus Protection on FW-1
From: Jyri Kaljundi <jk @ stallion . ee>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 1997 19:39:14 +0300 (EET DST)
To: Frank Darden <fdarden @ locked . com>
Cc: fw-1-mailinglist @ us . checkpoint . com, Firewalls mailing list <firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM>
In-reply-to: <3 . 0 . 2 . 32 . 19971016085845 . 007be270 @ 9 . 1 . 1 . 1>

On Thu, 16 Oct 1997, Frank Darden wrote:

> >By the way, does the CheckPoint firewall service take advantage of Windows
> >NT symmetric multi-processing?
> 
> Firewall-1 is a single threaded application. In 3.0a, multi-processor
> support was there, but they have mysteriously removed it from 3.0b. So for
> the time being, the answer is no, on all platforms.

This should already go into a FAQ somewhere: yes, FireWall-1 at least on
Solaris Sparc and Solaris x86 Intel does take advantage of
multiprocessing. Why: because Solaris itself distributes the load between
two or more processors. Believe me, if you add a second processor to dual
Pentium for example you can see how it gets better.

I don't know about NT, may be that really is so stupid it does not know
how to use both processors.

Jyri Kaljundi
jk @
 stallion .
 ee
AS Stallion Ltd
http://www.stallion.ee/




References:
Indexed By Date Previous: [no subject]
From: Zhu Chun <zhuchun @ buaa . edu . cn>
Next: Re: Firewalls: www & high port numbers
From: Leonard Miyata <leonard @ geminisecure . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Virus Protection on FW-1
From: Frank Darden <fdarden @ locked . com>
Next: Firewall for linux
From: cuco <cuco @ active . ch>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com