Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(October 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: [FW1] Re: Virus Protection on FW-1
From: "Ed Sawicki" <ed @ alcpress . com>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 1997 13:33:46 -0700
To: "Kevin Speichts" <kfs @ istar . ca>, "Jyri Kaljundi" <jk @ stallion . ee>, "Frank Darden" <fdarden @ locked . com>
Cc: <fw-1-mailinglist @ us . checkpoint . com>, "Firewalls mailing list" <firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM>
Reply-to: <ed @ alcpress . com>

> Smartly NT will use both processors, it was designed from the start to
use
> them.   Unlike other OS's like NetWare where multiprocessor support was
> graphed onto the primary OS.

NetWare was designed many years before NT at a time where multiple
processor machines were not available or needed. You're implying
that once a product is released, any changes to the product are
"grafted" on and are, therefore, not as good as features that were
put in the original design. While I certainly don't agree with this,
I hope you apply this belief consistently. NT will soon have
Wolfpack and Active Directory _grafted_ on to it. Is this correct? 

Even today, NetWare running on a single processor box will usually
outperform NT running on a multiple processor box.

> Jyri, please keep the OS religious chatter off this list please and thank
> you.
Yes, Jyri - don't go preaching religion unless it's the one "true"
religion.

Ed Sawicki - ALC Press 

Indexed By Date Previous: [no subject]
From: bob bryant <rhb1 @ gte . com>
Next: RE: Firewalls: Exchange mail proxy in DMZ.
From: "Wolfgang, Karl" <WolfganK @ IRWIN . ARMY . MIL>
Indexed By Thread Previous: RE: [FW1] Re: Virus Protection on FW-1
From: Beau Monday <bmonday @ bsquare . com>
Next: Re: [FW1] Re: Virus Protection on FW-1
From: "Kevin Speichts" <kfs @ istar . ca>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com