-----Original Message-----
From: Ed Sawicki <ed @
alcpress .
com>
To: Kevin Speichts <kfs @
istar .
ca>; Jyri Kaljundi <jk @
stallion .
ee>; Frank
Darden <fdarden @
locked .
com>
Cc: fw-1-mailinglist @
us .
checkpoint .
com <fw-1-mailinglist @
us .
checkpoint .
com>;
Firewalls mailing list <firewalls @
GreatCircle .
COM>
Date: Thursday, October 16, 1997 5:34 PM
Subject: Re: [FW1] Re: Virus Protection on FW-1
>NetWare was designed many years before NT at a time where multiple
>processor machines were not available or needed. You're implying
>that once a product is released, any changes to the product are
>"grafted" on and are, therefore, not as good as features that were
>put in the original design. While I certainly don't agree with this,
>I hope you apply this belief consistently. NT will soon have
>Wolfpack and Active Directory _grafted_ on to it. Is this correct?
Actually your implying that I implied that. The facts are that Netware
Multiprocessor support is an add.
I used that as an example given the context of the discussion, nothing more.
>
>Even today, NetWare running on a single processor box will usually
>outperform NT running on a multiple processor box.
>
Where did I say NT would outperform Netware?
>> Jyri, please keep the OS religious chatter off this list please and thank
>> you.
>Yes, Jyri - don't go preaching religion unless it's the one "true"
>religion.
>
Yes all hail the mighty Banyan ... umm I mean Novell... sorry couldn't
resist! ;)
|
|
