Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(November 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re[2]: Summary on Java Sanity Check
From: harley @ icrf . icnet . uk
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 1997 16:33:36 +0000 (GMT)
To: firewalls @ greatcircle . com

> >>P.S. The new Pentium bug, could this be implemented in Java or ActiveX :)
>      
> >In Java, I don't know... it's interpreted so I'm not really sure (the 
> >sandbox should prevent any attemp to run propriary code).  But in ActiveX, 
> >sure as hell you could do it!
>      
>      
>      What pentium bug???
> 

Don't you mean which pentium bug? B-)

-- 
David Harley                  |              alt.comp.virus FAQ
D .
 Harley @
 icrf .
 icnet .
 uk        |           & Anti-Virus Web Page
Support & Security Analyst    |    Folk London On-Line gig-list
Imperial Cancer Research Fund | http://webworlds.co.uk/dharley/


Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Finjan Surfin Gate Review
From: Adam Shostack <adam @ homeport . org>
Next: Re: NetScape vs Explorer
From: Justin peltier <jpeltier @ ITSUSNOW . COM>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re[2]: Summary on Java Sanity Check
From: "Guse, Darren J." <dguse @ ccmail . zim . bms . com>
Next: RE: Re[2]: Summary on Java Sanity Check
From: "Stackpole, Bill" <BSTACKPO @ sla . com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com