Hi,
Since the current topic is ecom. Does anyone know the high level
product details as well as finer details on oline banking solutions?
Looking for as complete a solution as possible in products plus say
ssl and perl. To do full 100% online banking with 128 bit encryption.
Authentication /etc
In short pick any physical/virtual bank that offers full online service
and please explain the products being used on the back end. Looks to me
like perl for database manipulation plus whatever servers and other
products are being used. Say to access transparently using NS & || M$
along with Quicken and /or Money. All --help would be greatly appreciated.
Best Regards,
dreamwvr
IEEE member
NCSA member
SAGE member
At 01:00 AM 11/20/97 -0800, you wrote:
>
>Firewalls-Digest Thursday, November 20 1997 Volume 06 : Number 548
>
>
>
>In this issue:
>
> Information Service Provider Online
> Firewalls-Digest V6 #547 -Reply
> Re: 7200 v. 7500 access-lists
> MBONE
> Re: PPTP & Routing
> opinions about Java?
> Security concerns on IP addressing
> Re: HTTP transparent proxy
> Re: MBONE
> Re: Internal Access control options -secureid, BoKS, ...
> Packet-Filtering-Rules
> Re: Security concerns on IP addressing
> Packet=Filtering=Rules
> Re: Performance Testing Tools
> DNS stuff
> Re: Performance Testing Tools
> Re: Penetration Detection Tools
>
>See the end of the digest for information on subscribing to the Firewalls
>or Firewalls-Digest mailing lists and on how to retrieve back issues.
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 17:15:14 +0800
>From: Kenny Kueh Kian Hong <KHKueh @
sibexlink .
com .
my>
>Subject: Information Service Provider Online
>
>Please feel free to come in this site URL://http://www.sibexlink.com.my.
>Sibexlink is a information service provider online.
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 06:02:23 -0500
>From: BRAD LOWE <LOWEB @
yankeegas .
com>
>Subject: Firewalls-Digest V6 #547 -Reply
>
>I will be out of the office until Friday, November 21st. If you need
support prior to that date please contact the Help Desk at 639-4357 (they
can page me if necessary). Thank you.
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 08:08:05 -0500
>From: Joe Loiacono <jloiacon @
csc .
com>
>Subject: Re: 7200 v. 7500 access-lists
>
>Peter Morissey wrote:
>>
>> The other factor is netflow switching. This can greatly
>> improve performance by more than a factor of 10, but
>> I'm wondering how much it helps when a lot of the traffic
>> is WWW, with lots of short duration connections.
>
>I think very soon we will see an ever increasing amount of
>high-bandwidth WWW applications like audio and video-streaming (RTP). So
>the netflow switching will become increasingly more valuable. QOS will
>become critical.
>
>Joe
>- --
>Joe Loiacono (301) 415-6153
>Computer Sciences Corporation http://www.csc.com
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 08:17:26 -0500
>From: "Matthew T. Davis" <mdavis @
iagnet .
net>
>Subject: MBONE
>
>Hello all,
>
>Has anyone had any luck passing MBONE through a firewall, specifically
>through FW-1? I have a few ppl on our network that would like to get it,
>but I have yet to really grasp how it works so I can pass it. Thanks in
>advance.
>
>
>- --
>Matthew T. Davis NOC Coordinator Internet Access Group
>mdavis@@iagnet.net support@@iagnet.net http://www.iagnet.net
>DID: (216) 902-5469 Tech: (216) 902-5460 Main: 1-800-637-4IAG
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 09:02:53 -0500
>From: mfeinstein @
newoak .
com (Michael G. Feinstein)
>Subject: Re: PPTP & Routing
>
>PPTP gives the user an IP address on your private network which is
>encapsulated inside the traffic sent on the public Internet. The
>packets come out of the PPTP server and are routed on your private LAN
>like any other packets on that segment. One thing PPTP doesn't do a
>good job with is giving you access back out to the Internet. When you
>have the PPTP tunnel open, all the traffic goes through the tunnel.
>Microsoft's PPTP server doesn't do a good job sending traffic back out
>to the Internet if the user is trying to simultaneously access the
>private LAN and public Internet.
>
>You may want to check out my company's product, the NOC 4000 Extranet
>Access Switch. It acts as a PPTP server, and IPsec tunnel mode server,
>and includes the ability to customize a user profile which includes
>custom filtering, bandwidth management, and security parameters. Our
>Web address is http://www.newoak.com. By the way, our product can
>handle the 'split' traffic case described above.
>
>- --
>Michael Feinstein New Oak Communications
>VP, Product Marketing 125 Nagog Park
>Tel: 978-266-1011 x103 Acton, MA 01720
>Fax: 978-266-1080 http://www.newoak.com
>mfeinstein @
newoak .
com Pager: 800-592-6311
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 09:13:41 -0600
>From: "Robert Laird"<rlaird @
duke-energy .
com>
>Subject: opinions about Java?
>
>My experience with Java through a firewall is that it's sl-o-o-o-o-o-wwww.
>It seems to take forever to load and then another forever to run. I can't
>find anything in the firewall itself that is slowing it down, so I'm
>wondering
>if large Java apps are simply .... SLOW!
>
>What is your opinion about whether large Java apps are appropriate
>for mission critical purposes when uses by Internet clients, traversing
>a firewall?
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Mon, 03 Nov 1997 15:00:43 +0800
>From: M S Szeto <"ims02 @
netvigator .
com"@netvigator.com>
>Subject: Security concerns on IP addressing
>
>Dear all,
>
>Does anybody know if my private network is going to be connected
>to the Internet, what are the most appropriate approach relating to
>network security on using the IP addressing scheme on my private
>network?
>
>If I follow the RFC1918, what are the benefit? Is a firewall
>still be necessary connected between my private network and Internet?
>
>Many thanks.
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 08:46:35 -0600
>From: Andy Howard <achowar @
erenj .
com>
>Subject: Re: HTTP transparent proxy
>
>I am combining all the answers that have come back to me, either via the
>list or directly. Sorry for any repeats, but I thot all the answers in
>one place might be useful to somebody. I make no claims as to the
>accuracy of the info, I am just cutting and pasting the
>answers............
>- --------------
>
>> Alot of the security proxy systems do support transparent proxing as
>> described.
>>
>> Raptor for example listens to requests directed through it by routing
>> and passes them onto the outside world. By default the proxy listens
>> only on port 80, but can be configured to listen on additional ports
>> such as 8000, 8080, 8008, etc. And as stated requires no extra
>> configuration on the client end.
>- --------------------------
>
>cisco cache engine, netcache when used transparently. Even Squid.
>
>You just need a way to direct the packets, which can be done with some
>routers
>or using something like ip-filter.
>- ------------------------
>
>actually I have heard of a hardware-based transparent proxy (http)
>product... if I recall well, it is called "cache engine" made by
>cisco. Quite nice... it can handle all the http access to the outside,
>caching lots o GB, and the user doest not even know that he/she is
>using a http proxy. Check it at www.cisco.com.
>- ----------
>
>The combination of Squid and IP Filter on a FreeBSD or Solaris box
>allows this to be done also. If using FreeBSD, then the whole
>solution is free :-)
>- ----------
>
>A true transparent proxy is now available from Cisco System, it's known
>as Cache Engine.
>It is for the moment only supporting http proxying, it has to be
>combined with a cisco 7000
>series router.
>
>Additional information can be found at the following URL:
>http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/751/cache/index.shtml
>
>The concept is quite interesting actually.
>- -------------
>
>Milkyway offers a proxy firewall on Sun and NT that
>doesn't require proxy configuration within the browser. An eval copy of
>the
>NT version is available at www.milkyway.com
>- ------------
>
>A number of vendors support Transparent Proxy features exactly
>as you described - true application level proxying without requiring
>special client modifications or configuration.
>The PrivateNet firewall from NEC, now discontinued,
>had that very feature. I also believe Borderware,
>Raptor, and TIS Gauntlet currently have products that support
>transparent proxies.
>- ------------
>
>A recent article about the ipfwadm utility used by Linux, mentions that
>this utility also offers transparent proxing (without modification on
>the
>client side).
>- -----------
>
>A recent article about the ipfwadm utility used by Linux, mentions that
>this utility also offers transparent proxing (without modification on
>the
>client side).
>
>- --
>Andy Howard
>achowar @
erenj .
com
>- -- the above comments are mine only--
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 15:23:41 -0500
>From: Joe Loiacono <jloiacon @
csc .
com>
>Subject: Re: MBONE
>
>Matthew T. Davis wrote:
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> Has anyone had any luck passing MBONE through a firewall, specifically
>> through FW-1? I have a few ppl on our network that would like to get it,
>> but I have yet to really grasp how it works so I can pass it. Thanks in
>> advance.
>
>Depends on your configuration. If your multicast router and clients are
>inside the firewall, and you're using a GRE tunnel from your provider,
>then you need to pass IP protocols DVMRP (set up a match: ip_p=2 for
>Firewall-1) and GRE (set up a match: ip_p=47 for Firewall-1) from your
>provider's tunnel end-point to your tunnel endpoint, through the
>firewall.
>
>If your router and clients are on opposite sides of the firewall, you'll
>need to pass IGMP through the firewall between them.
>
>Joe
>- --
>Joe Loiacono (301) 415-6153
>Computer Sciences Corporation http://www.csc.com
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 16:22:09 -0500
>From: Vin McLellan <vin @
shore .
net>
>Subject: Re: Internal Access control options -secureid, BoKS, ...
>
> John Pettitt <jpp @
cybersource .
com> queried the FW Listocracy:
>
>>Hi, we are upgrading some of our internal access controls in light of users
>>being incapable of choosing realistic passwords (and not keeping them a
>>secret when they do).
>
> An echo of the poet Horace: "Natruram expellas furca, tamen usque
>recurret" Freehand translation:-) Human nature is resiliant and damn
>stubborn. Any policy which tries to deny or banish it -- even when it is
>enforced with a pitchfork -- is ultimately doomed. (Welcome, JP, to the
>ranks of the Realists!)
>
> I hope you will report back to the List on what
>authentication/access control tech you eventually choose (and why) to
>address your (multi-level?) access problem. Web farms are new and a
>potentially huge business, and managing security for surfers, farm
>administrators, (and remote clients who want direct control of web
>content,) is a challenge with many potential responses -- some better than
>others. The web farm is also an environment where the idea of a security
>perimeter is inherently silly, right?
>
>>We're looking at going with SecureID as an authentication system but have
>>some issues:
>>
>>We want to use it on every system (I.E. all machines are bastions) rather
>>than as a perimeter screen. The issue we have with this is tokens are a one
>>shot deal and we have to wait 60 seconds before we can log into another
>>system. Since we're running 10's of machines in an OLTP environment (web
>>servers) this gets to be a pain real fast.
>
> As Erick pointed out, you can get a 30-second SecurID (and in
>praxis, the delay is typically a fraction of that.) In rare environments, I
>grant, any delay is an issue.... If your staff will be using SecurID in the
>WebID configuration to access your Netscape servers, I've got a hack that
>might be useful. (I've been a consultant to SDTI for many years.)
>
> WebID demands two-factor SecurID authentication, and can also
>_require_ SSL, before allowing a user access to protected web directories,
>pages, etc., within an otherwise open website. When a user makes a
>connection and authenticates through WebID, the ACE/Server lodges a cookie
>in the user's browser to make it a pseudo-stateful connection (allowing
>repeated http hits, without re-authentication.)
>The cookie can be timed, or otherwise set to implode. It can also, however,
>allow repeated access to all servers in the same (Internet) domain: e.g.
>www.domain.com.
>
> Even if your web farm actually has many domains, routing your admin
>connection thru a packet filter which can change www domain names -- so the
>standard browser used by your staff sees all the farm's servers as a single
>domain -- can allow repeated, immediate, and fully-authenticated local
>access to multiple web servers. (The WebID cookie can also report the name
>of the user with each hit -- ask SDTI for the supplementary code -- so the
>web access privileges can be personalized.)
>
> Obviously, if you allow, or plan to allow, remote access to the
>farm's servers for your content providers, this becomes cumbersome, however.
>
>>Our supplier is suggesting we look at BoKS which seems to offer a single
>>login solution, the customer list (mostly banks) is impressive, but I'm a
>>little skeptical of such things.
>
> As I'm sure many folks have told you, this sounds like the blind
>man who feels the elephant's ear, and then, some distance away, the
>elephant's hind leg... and assumes, not unreasonably, that he's dealing
>with two different critters;-) SDTI owns RSA (to which I know CyberSource
>has already made a major committment) and SDTI/RSA recently purchased
>Dynasoft, the Swedish firm which developed BoKS.
>In '98 -- sez SDTI -- ACE/SecurID token-based authentication and the BoKS'
>suite of UNIX access coordinators, and client/server Single Sign-on and PKI
>technologies will be merged into a single modular product line, to be
>enhanced throughout by RSA crypto.
>
> BoKS (a Swedish acronym for Secure Access Control) is best known as
>a multiple-server Single Sign-on (SSO) architecture which (a) scales
>extremely well, (b) is extraordinarily resiliant and robust (c) wraps both
>UNIX and NT client apps, rather than requiring some equivalent of
>"kerberizing" all application code, and (d) supports a full public key
>infrastructure (PKI) with an integrated X509-based Certification Authority
>(CA.)
>
> SDTI has said it will offer BoKS agents for NT servers in '98 too.
>
> Being skeptical about global PKI is reasonable, given the level of
>hype, the relatively frail infrastructure, and the limited experience
>anyone has had with extended multi-server key and certificate management.
>Local, corporate, PKI is much less daunting, and IMNSHO, PKC is about to
>flip the system and data security world topsy-turvy. (PKI -- and in
>particular, multi-functional digital signatures, has the potential to
>transform InfoSec from a burdensome obligation into a
>productivity-enhancer, with a concrete and vivid payback. New problems,
>surely -- but nicer work, if we can get it;-)
>
> Being skeptical about single sign-on is also reasonable, given the
>challenges of Kerberos/DCE, the SSO model best known in the US. (Being
>skeptical about synchronized data bases among multiple networked servers is
>surely reasonable too, given the difficulty many vendors have had in
>delivering truely scalable solutions.)
>The List, I'm certain, would be very interested in your evaluation of how
>well BoKS addresses these issues.
>
> BoKS is an elegant -- but big and functionally-rich -- solution to
>demands for Enterprise-oriented authentication, access control, data
>integrity and communications security. Architectural options are abundant.
>Many, perhaps most, sites today implement only a portion of the BoKS
>Security Suite.
>
> The financial community -- under great pressure from both their
>internal and external auditors -- has created a mini-bandwagon for BoKS,
>particularly in volatile, high-security, trading-floor environments (bonds,
>currencies, stocks, etc.) Chase Manhattan, Citibank, and Wells Fargo
>(three of the top four US banks) are reportedly standardizing on BoKS'
>access control systems. Typically, however, these banks are using BoKS in
>all-UNIX environments, and for now, only for centralized authentication and
>access control (supplementary to the file-level access control that is
>still maintained in each Unix host.)
>
> CyberSource's issues and criteria is likely to be quite different.
>It sounds like you are offering open HTTP connections, and e-commerce
>backoffice support, for a warehouse of bastion-configured webservers. Tell
>us more. We don't hear much, on this List, about life without the warm and
>snuggly protection of a FW guardian;-)
>
> The banks wanted, above all, robust, scalable, and
>cryptographically-secure authentication -- centralized and easily audited
>- -- for legacy UNIX applications.
>
> One US bank's internal network, for example, already has _400_
>synchronized (replicated-master) BoKS servers in a much larger global
>network. I think the largest BoKS installation today is on a Swedish
>government network that supports 15,000 users -- but the BoKS design spec
>credibly promises support for up to100,000 users.
>
>>Do any of you have any knowledge of BoKS? Is it any good? What else should
>>we look at? Are there alternatives to secureid that support NT, Solaris,
>>HP/UX and Netscape Servers?
>>
> I think the FW community has potentially a lot to learn from
>CyberSource's evaluation of its various options. I hope you will share it
>with the List.
>
> Suerte,
> _Vin
>
> Vin McLellan + The Privacy Guild + <vin @
shore .
net>
> 53 Nichols St., Chelsea, MA 02150 USA <617> 884-5548
> -- <@><@> --
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 17:25:43 -0400
>From: Edierley Batista Messias <ebm @
dcc .
fua .
br>
>Subject: Packet-Filtering-Rules
>
>===========================================================================
=====
>Hi people of GreatCircle
>
>I start to build a firewall here in my site,
>and a constructed the Bastion Host with all the Proxy Servers
>My architeture is Screened Host.
>
>So now, I need to build the packet filtering rules on the router,
>a Cisco 2508.
>
>Do you know some sites that have some rules for example, like Telnet and
HTTP?
>
>I searched for every sites but a coudn't find anyone.
>
>So, since now thank you for everybody.
>
>
>Edierley Messias
>http://www.dcc.fua.br/~segredu/firewall
>http://www.fua.br/~ebm
>ebm @
dcc .
fua .
br
> O/
> /|
> / \
>===========================================================================
=====
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 19:24:38 -0500
>From: Frank Santiago <santia_f @
INS .
COM>
>Subject: Re: Security concerns on IP addressing
>
>"The benefit that you get from private addressing is that you can grow your
>internal IP networks without worrying about running out of addresses(using
>10.0.0.0 for example). Also, You can eliminate the risk of inadvertently
>using other networks legitimate addresses." You have to consider the
>effort of
>changing the IP addresses in the whole network! Some people combine, both
>registered IP addresses with private IP addresses. This way you can still
>use your existing IP addressing and then add private address for new subnets.
>(try to use DHCP).
>
>If you want to connect your private network to the Internet, it is
>a good idea to use a firewall.You want to control the access to your
>network. Too many hackers out there! Also, because you are not suppose to
>advertise RFC1918 to the Internet, you can use the firewall to do Network
>Address Translation(NAT). The Cisco PIX is an excellent solution for this
>type of network.
>
>I'm working in a project using registered ip addresses, private
>ip address, NAT, DHCP and the PIX firewall. If you want to talk about
>implementing something similar in your network or if you have
>any questions, please don't hesitate to page me:(888)812-2098
>
>____________________________________________________________
> INTERNATIONAL NETWORK SERVICES
>____________________________________________________________
>Frank Santiago Phone: (919)319-0400 x346(INS)
>Network Systems Engineer Pager: (888)812-2098
>Cisco Certified, CCIE #2651
>____________________________________________________________
> I LOVE THIS GAME
>
>At 03:00 PM 11/3/97 +0800, M S Szeto wrote:
>>Dear all,
>>
>>Does anybody know if my private network is going to be connected
>>to the Internet, what are the most appropriate approach relating to
>>network security on using the IP addressing scheme on my private
>>network?
>>
>>If I follow the RFC1918, what are the benefit? Is a firewall
>>still be necessary connected between my private network and Internet?
>>
>>Many thanks.
>>
>>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 20:05:25 -0400
>From: Edierley Batista Messias <ebm @
dcc .
fua .
br>
>Subject: Packet=Filtering=Rules
>
>===========================================================================
=====
>Hi people of GreatCircle
>
>I start to build a firewall here in my site,
>and a constructed the Bastion Host with all the Proxy Servers
>My architeture is Screened Host.
>
>So now, I need to build the packet filtering rules on the router,
>a Cisco 2508.
>
>Do you know some sites that have some rules for example, like Telnet and
HTTP?
>
>I searched for every sites but a coudn't find anyone.
>
>So, since now thank you for everybody.
>
>
>Edierley Messias
>http://www.dcc.fua.br/~segredu/firewall
>http://www.fua.br/~ebm
>ebm @
dcc .
fua .
br
> O/
> /|
> / \
>===========================================================================
=====
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 17:17:56 -0800
>From: "Carl A. Wescott" <eyethink @
cse .
ucsc .
edu>
>Subject: Re: Performance Testing Tools
>
> Is anyone aware of any performance measurement tools that would simulate
> thousands of users performing various methods of access to and through a
> firewall? Such as, internal to external ftp, http, https, telnet and
> VPN?
>
>PurePerformix will cover http and https.
>
>- --Carl
>
> Thanks,
>
> Todd Hudspeth
> Norwest Services, Inc.
>
> todd .
hudspeth @
norwest .
com
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 21:28:31 -0500 (EST)
>From: Sick Puppy <sikpuppy @
maestro .
maestro .
com>
>Subject: DNS stuff
>
>I would really like to do something nasty to the thoughtless bastard
>that sent me e-mail offering to sell me a dog intelligence test for $20.
>
>Anyway, on to the DNS question. Suppose that we academic researchers have
>our own little corner of the Internet that we call happydawg.net, an
>e-mail server mailgate.happydawg.net and a web sever www.happydawg.net.
>Also suppose that we are tired of being broke academics and want to make a
>small commercial venture. We want to change our entire domain from
>happydawg.net to xxxcatabuse.com, with mailgate.xxxcatabuse.com and web
>server www.xxxcatabuse.com
>
>Our DNS is a little SCO box, battered and cracked so many times its
>surprising it still runs. Can we alias our entire present domain
>happydawg.net to xxxcatabuse.net with an entry in the DNS or do we have
>to set up a new DNS? Many references on the Internet will point to the
>old happydawg.net and we need to get the whole lot redirected to
>xxxcatabuse.com
>
>We are researchers. We are not expected to know this kind of practical
>stuff. Thats why I am asking you security perfessors.
>
> Sick Puppy, the (original) Cat_Eating_Dawg
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Thu, 20 Nov 97 07:04:35 +0200
>From: Ziv Dascalu <ziv @
AbirNet .
com>
>Subject: Re: Performance Testing Tools
>
>- --- On Wed, 19 Nov 1997 17:17:56 -0800 "Carl A. Wescott"
<eyethink @
cse .
ucsc .
edu> wrote:
>>
>> Is anyone aware of any performance measurement tools that would simulate
>> thousands of users performing various methods of access to and through a
>> firewall? Such as, internal to external ftp, http, https, telnet and
>> VPN?
>>
>> PurePerformix will cover http and https.
>>
>> --Carl
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Todd Hudspeth
>> Norwest Services, Inc.
>>
>> todd .
hudspeth @
norwest .
com
>
>- ---------------End of Original Message-----------------
>
>if you want to test te network traffic you may want to record a week worth
of network
>traffic with a sniffer and play it with a very
>small interval between the packets
>ZIv
>...===== A B I R N E T Active Network Protection =====
>AbirNet returns network control back to your company. SessionWall-3
provides you all the
>capabilities you need to fearlessly connect your business to the Internet
and effectively
>manage your Intranet usage in a single, easy to use, affordable software
product.
>See us at http://www.AbirNet.com or call (817)251-7000 or (800)245-1688.
>========== Get an EVALUATION COPY at <http://www.AbirNet.com> ===========
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Thu, 20 Nov 97 07:21:02 +0200
>From: Ziv Dascalu <ziv @
AbirNet .
com>
>Subject: Re: Penetration Detection Tools
>
>- --- On Fri, 7 Nov 1997 12:57:20 -0500 Neil_Buckley/CAM/Lotus @
lotus .
com
wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Does anyone have recomendations for third party penetration detection
>> tools, I am fairly familiar with most freeware products for UNIX, but I
>> need a company wide solution.
>>
>> Thanks in advance for any info,
>>
>> Neil Buckley
>> nbuckley @
lotus .
com
>>
>
>- ---------------End of Original Message-----------------
>
>you need to look at the search engines under the term "intrusion detection"
>there are many many tools ranging from low level tcp-ip security up to
network
>scanners for anti-virus and malaises applets
>
>hope this helps
>Ziv
>
>
>...===== A B I R N E T Active Network Protection =====
>AbirNet returns network control back to your company. SessionWall-3
provides you all the
>capabilities you need to fearlessly connect your business to the Internet
and effectively
>manage your Intranet usage in a single, easy to use, affordable software
product.
>See us at http://www.AbirNet.com or call (817)251-7000 or (800)245-1688.
>========== Get an EVALUATION COPY at <http://www.AbirNet.com> ===========
>
>------------------------------
>
>End of Firewalls-Digest V6 #548
>*******************************
>
>To unsubscribe from Firewalls-Digest, send the following command
>in the body of a message to "Majordomo @
GreatCircle .
COM":
>
>unsubscribe firewalls-digest
>
>If you want to subscribe or unsubscribe an address other than the
>account the mail is coming from, such as a local redistribution list,
>then append that address to the command; for example, to subscribe
>"local-firewalls":
>
>subscribe firewalls-digest local-firewalls @
your .
domain .
net
>
>A non-digest (direct mail) version of this list is also available; to
>subscribe to that instead, replace all instances of "firewalls-digest"
>in the commands above with "firewalls".
>
>Compressed back issues are available for anonymous FTP from
>FTP.GreatCircle.COM, in pub/firewalls/digest/vNN.nMMM.Z (where "NN"
>is the volume number, and "MMM" is the issue number).
>
>
|
|
