-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
It's nice for very small applications, IMHO. I set it up on a four
user network (modem share) but that's about as far as it reliably
goes... (ergo you can do more but you'll wish you hadn't.:-)) I've
found problems with it and NT, and getting ftp logins to work,
without ripping the Not Tough system out of the wall and braining
Wingate creators and Bill Gates with it.
IMHO, there are a heck of alot of other, better, easier ways to get
the job done.
At 04:03 PM 12/8/97 RST, you wrote:
>nuqneH,
>
>Does anybody have expirience with software product named "Wingate"?
It seems to
>be something like cheap entry-level firewall system for Windows 95
and NT.
>People often do ask me if they need a "real" firewall or Wingate is
enough for
>them. So the questions are how good is it from the viewpoint of
>
>a) security
>b) control and monitoring features
>c) protocol support
>d) administration
>e) performance
>
>Thanks for any info.
>
>--
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _
> Must be a visit from the dead.. _| o |_ | | _|| | / _||_|
|_ |_ |_
> CU in Hell .......... Arkan#iD |_ o _||_| _||_| / _| | o
|_||_||_|
>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0
Charset: noconv
iQEVAwUBNI3XwseWPtttGqZhAQHEhQf+MsuDI874ov+Jx+hpLWjt9426yiL9Yzkx
tWZEYT5hPtQzyfd9REybEpoDtLBSO61Fo+RBm4COQTw0/fxU429nbMU4ZkV4jOBG
iu+p365MLJULKcA3yRlRPsbUK39UWB7vmBuE+OnkSnzSocueVpCVF5A1TQB+FE00
gKXCc69AU7ir7goeUWZ3MP7qLjenuYEg3yqJIgNAcaHKRxaxu48Ppkaah4Lca7P8
XxMzrRq8dCGKdk+dtGXdDKibeVeUu1ym8sWTbMRhtv90YAffzawOgKyidHJNUyD7
SzfeB4qsdIxY+IPGsVlu+MlrKhPAx6CwvXL536+/9eF79EhSEZk5Kg==
=jxg4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Clyde Williamson
PGP Public Key found at http://users1.ee.net/clydew/pgp.htm
"My uncle always said that there was more
than one way to skin a cat....
I guess that explains the fur pants."
References:
-
Wingate?
From: ark @
mpak .
convey .
ru (-= ArkanoiD =-)
|
|
