part of the problem some people (including me) have with NT is how much
hardware it take to get decent results. Yes you can get good results if
you use a dual PII-233 with 256MB ram but if you can do the same job on a
P-166 with 64-128MB ram with a different OS why should you go with NT? yes
the graphics are nice but if this is a server that sits unless checked it
is often nicer to have a machine you can telnet into to manage.
David Lang
On Thu, 11 Dec 1997, Billy Verreynne wrote:
> Mark Guzman said:
> >Speak for yourself, thats why i stoped using win95, word kept crashing,
> >and the proxys i had setup kept causing freezes and crashes, and explorer
> >liked to crash by itself. I stoped using NT because it is too slow to use
> >as a cheap firewall/router (cheap meaning hw wise).
>
> Which is exactly why you have problems with NT - cheap hardware. Get a
> decent hardware platform to run NT on and stop blaming NT for being to slow,
> to buggy and all that other crap. NT is not Win95.
>
> regards,
> Billy
>
>
Follow-Ups:
References:
|
|
