Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(January 1998)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Re[2]: Hardware for seperating LAN from dialouts
From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts @ clark . net>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 1998 09:26:32 -0500 (EST)
To: RANDAL LATHROP <RANDAL_LATHROP @ mech . disa . mil>
Cc: iank @ magna . com . au, Ryan Russell <ryanr @ sybase . com>, ian @ sunbeach . net, firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <000622BB . 001261 @ mech . disa . mil>

On Tue, 6 Jan 1998, RANDAL LATHROP wrote:

>      But this is true only if you are running a service (daemon) that can 
>      be exploited.  If you do not share any resources on your system, are 

Or a client that can be exploited, or if portions of the OS can be 
exploited...

If you've got a few thousand users, and you have enough control over the 
OS, stack, clients, and configuration, as well as a way to audit that, 
then you're doing well enough to probably not worry about it.  For the 
real world, it's *trivially* easy to get a user to load (a) a demo for 
finance/mailroom/logistics/pick_a_target, or (b) a game, or extension to 
Quake, or (c) New version of a browser, E-mail client, or IRC program.  
If it's done right, most of them will get the IS people to lend them a 
modem for the duration of the attack... er demo.

How many places go through testing new Internet clients on a test bed 
with modems, LAN cards, and record and decode the traffic?  How many 
places have enough control over their user population to specify client 
versions, and distribution channels?  Probably about as many who run 
virus suscptable systems with no scanners, no protection, and who get 
zero incidents.  Next time you see a virus, ask yourself what would have 
happened if that was a sleeping trojan... 

Paul
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul D. Robertson      "My statements in this message are personal opinions
proberts @
 clark .
 net      which may have no basis whatsoever in fact."
                                                                     PSB#9280



References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Re[2]: Hardware for seperating LAN from dialouts
From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts @ clark . net>
Next: Re: Re[2]: Hardware for seperating LAN from dialouts
From: "H. Morrow Long" <morrow . long @ yale . edu>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re[2]: Hardware for seperating LAN from dialouts
From: RANDAL_LATHROP @ mech . disa . mil (RANDAL LATHROP)
Next: Re: Re[2]: Hardware for seperating LAN from dialouts
From: Oliver Kubis <oliverk @ ols-eds . de>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com