Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(January 1998)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Freelance internal hacking a bad idea (was: Exposing fraudulent
From: Aydin Edguer <edguer @ MorningStar . Com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 1998 21:27:18 -0500 (EST)
To: firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <199801151755 . MAA23111 @ luomat . peak . org> from "Timothy J Luoma" at Jan 15, 98 12:55:21 pm

> Yeah.... Remember the story of Randall Schwartz @ Intel.  He *was*
> the sysadmin and lost his job for running 'crack' because his actions
> were seen as a hack-attack.
> 
> Then he was taken to court and sued.

Actually, it was not a civil lawsuit (the typical meaning of "sued").
He was charged and convicted of three felony counts (criminal trial).
This was back in 1995.  Keep in mind that there have been a number of
new federal and state "computer crime" laws passed in the last couple
of years.

For more information on the Randal L. Schwartz case see :
     http://www.lightlink.com/spacenka/fors/

I would not recommend exposing security holes by actively exploiting them
until you *very* carefully consider the consequences.


References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: My solution to the fraudulent SA problem
From: Henry Hertz Hobbit <hhhobbit @ icarus . weber . edu>
Next: Re: My solution to the fraudulent SA problem
From: daemond @ ibm . net
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Freelance internal hacking a bad idea (was: Exposing fraudulent SA's)
From: Timothy J Luoma <luomat @ peak . org>
Next: Re: Freelance internal hacking a bad idea (was: Exposing fraudulent SA's)
From: "Jim Raykowski" <jimrski @ cts . com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com