Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(February 1998)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: smurf attach
From: Rabid Wombat <wombat @ mcfeely . bsfs . org>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 1998 10:03:13 -0500 (EST)
To: Rick Osteen <rosteen1 @ elp . rr . com>
Cc: Firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <1 . 5 . 4 . 32 . 19980202035957 . 00723fbc @ elp . rr . com>

Smurf attacks use a third-party system to attack a target. The third-party
system has directed broadcast enabled, and has a fat-pipe to the Internet.
The attacker can generate a huge flood of broadcasts from the third-party
system, without needing a fat-pipe connection of their own. The use of the
third-party system also makes tracking somewhat difficult. 

-r.w.

On Sun, 1 Feb 1998, Rick Osteen wrote:

> Sorry for the ignorance, but what is a "Smurf Attack"?
> 
> Thanks for any insight,
> Rick Osteen
> 
> 


References:
  • smurf attach
    From: Rick Osteen <rosteen1 @ elp . rr . com>
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: FW-1 and FIN scanning (was: nmap tool)
From: Vijay Valayatham <vijay @ telekom . com . my>
Next: Re: best firewall
From: John Whittaker <john @ zoneoftrust . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Smurf Attack [Was: Re: smurf attach]
From: Paul Ferguson <ferguson @ cisco . com>
Next: Re: smurf attach
From: "H. Morrow Long" <morrow . long @ yale . edu>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com