Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(February 1998)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: RE: FW: LINUX FIREWALLS
From: Adam Fenn <Adam . Fenn @ fennco . com>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 1998 20:10:02 -0600
To: "'M. Asim Rasheed'" <mail!asim @ uunet . uu . net>
Cc: "'Firewalls'" <firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM>

Don't matter what OS you use.. You aren't supposed to use your broadcast
subnets.. (the first and last ones).. Although some routers and do allow
you to use subnet 0 (the first one), although it is recommended against,
even in the RFC..

Adam

>-----Original Message-----
>From:	M. Asim Rasheed [SMTP:mail!asim @
 uunet .
 uu .
 net]
>Sent:	Friday, February 06, 1998 3:19 PM
>To:	Scott Robert Lenz
>Cc:	'firewalls @
 greatcircle .
 com'
>Subject:	Re: FW: LINUX FIREWALLS
>
>Unlike, M$ restricted routing capabilities, a Linux box can be used for
>any viable subnet configuration that you can think of. I remember
>seeing
>this thing in one of M$ study materials that they donot recommend the
>use
>of the  first and the last subnet of an IP address pool.
>
>No such thing in Linux.
>
> 
>


Follow-Ups:
Indexed By Date Previous: ATM Network Security Issues
From: Lim Chay Yong <limcy @ sp . ac . sg>
Next: RE: SSL Proxies revisited
From: Joseph Judge <joej @ ultranet . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Masquerading Security
From: Christophe Dupre <cdupre @ risq . qc . ca>
Next: RE: FW: LINUX FIREWALLS
From: "M. Asim Rasheed" <mail!asim @ uunet . uu . net>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com