Given a choice between the two, I would go for Sun and would blindly say no
to HP. The support of Sun is much better out here and I have had no big
problems with Sun machines.
Always remember you're unique, just like everyone else.
From: Wes Kaufmann <wes @
To: Ken Williams <jkwilli2 @
Cc: firewalls @
COM <firewalls @
Date: Wednesday, February 25, 1998 8:19 AM
Subject: Re: HP vs. Solaris
>My opinion and experience. HP support is great. They've came out with
>special patches for my machines when I asked. They bend over backwards to
>support you. Their hardware is the best business machine hands down, stays
>running when Suns want a reboot. Their new direction towards merced with
>Intel shows that they are staying very competitive. Never had a problem
>getting anything I tried running on a HP.
>At 01:04 PM 2/24/98 -0500, you wrote:
>>On Tue, 24 Feb 1998, Emmanuel Gadaix wrote:
>>>Someone was asking about comparing HP and Solaris architecture.
>>>You can have a look at
>>They asked for a comparison, not advertising drivel, didn't they?
>>My experience: Go with Sun. Simply better design, better support, simply