Given a choice between the two, I would go for Sun and would blindly say no
to HP. The support of Sun is much better out here and I have had no big
problems with Sun machines.
Regards,
Gaurav Sabharwal
gauravs @
hss .
hns .
com
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Always remember you're unique, just like everyone else.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-----Original Message-----
From: Wes Kaufmann <wes @
osds .
com>
To: Ken Williams <jkwilli2 @
unity .
ncsu .
edu>
Cc: firewalls @
GreatCircle .
COM <firewalls @
GreatCircle .
COM>
Date: Wednesday, February 25, 1998 8:19 AM
Subject: Re: HP vs. Solaris
>My opinion and experience. HP support is great. They've came out with
>special patches for my machines when I asked. They bend over backwards to
>support you. Their hardware is the best business machine hands down, stays
>running when Suns want a reboot. Their new direction towards merced with
>Intel shows that they are staying very competitive. Never had a problem
>getting anything I tried running on a HP.
>
>
>At 01:04 PM 2/24/98 -0500, you wrote:
>>On Tue, 24 Feb 1998, Emmanuel Gadaix wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>Someone was asking about comparing HP and Solaris architecture.
>>>You can have a look at
>>>http://www2.hp.com/cgi-bin/dmo/fe.pl/gsy/hp-ux/stalks.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>They asked for a comparison, not advertising drivel, didn't they?
>>
>>My experience: Go with Sun. Simply better design, better support, simply
>>better.
>>
>>Ken
>>
>>http://152.7.11.38/~tattooman/
>>
>>
>>
>Wes Kaufmann
>mailto:wes @
osds .
com
>
>http://www.osds.com
>
Follow-Ups:
|
|
