Is this Sun vs HP or Solaris vs HPUX ? Seems very off-topic.
-Danny G
Gaurav Sabharwal wrote:
>
> Given a choice between the two, I would go for Sun and would blindly say no
> to HP. The support of Sun is much better out here and I have had no big
> problems with Sun machines.
>
> Regards,
>
> Gaurav Sabharwal
> gauravs @
hss .
hns .
com
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> Always remember you're unique, just like everyone else.
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wes Kaufmann <wes @
osds .
com>
> To: Ken Williams <jkwilli2 @
unity .
ncsu .
edu>
> Cc: firewalls @
GreatCircle .
COM <firewalls @
GreatCircle .
COM>
> Date: Wednesday, February 25, 1998 8:19 AM
> Subject: Re: HP vs. Solaris
>
> >My opinion and experience. HP support is great. They've came out with
> >special patches for my machines when I asked. They bend over backwards to
> >support you. Their hardware is the best business machine hands down, stays
> >running when Suns want a reboot. Their new direction towards merced with
> >Intel shows that they are staying very competitive. Never had a problem
> >getting anything I tried running on a HP.
> >
> >
> >At 01:04 PM 2/24/98 -0500, you wrote:
> >>On Tue, 24 Feb 1998, Emmanuel Gadaix wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>Someone was asking about comparing HP and Solaris architecture.
> >>>You can have a look at
> >>>http://www2.hp.com/cgi-bin/dmo/fe.pl/gsy/hp-ux/stalks.html
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>They asked for a comparison, not advertising drivel, didn't they?
> >>
> >>My experience: Go with Sun. Simply better design, better support, simply
> >>better.
> >>
> >>Ken
> >>
> >>http://152.7.11.38/~tattooman/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >Wes Kaufmann
> >mailto:wes @
osds .
com
> >
> >http://www.osds.com
> >
--
________________________________________________________________________
Danny Gumport
Phone: (212) 593-0689 mailto:Me @
DannyGumport .
com
Fax: (212) 832-7502 http://WWW.DannyGumport.com
Follow-Ups:
References:
|
|
