Is this Sun vs HP or Solaris vs HPUX ? Seems very off-topic.
Gaurav Sabharwal wrote:
> Given a choice between the two, I would go for Sun and would blindly say no
> to HP. The support of Sun is much better out here and I have had no big
> problems with Sun machines.
> Gaurav Sabharwal
> gauravs @
> Always remember you're unique, just like everyone else.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wes Kaufmann <wes @
> To: Ken Williams <jkwilli2 @
> Cc: firewalls @
COM <firewalls @
> Date: Wednesday, February 25, 1998 8:19 AM
> Subject: Re: HP vs. Solaris
> >My opinion and experience. HP support is great. They've came out with
> >special patches for my machines when I asked. They bend over backwards to
> >support you. Their hardware is the best business machine hands down, stays
> >running when Suns want a reboot. Their new direction towards merced with
> >Intel shows that they are staying very competitive. Never had a problem
> >getting anything I tried running on a HP.
> >At 01:04 PM 2/24/98 -0500, you wrote:
> >>On Tue, 24 Feb 1998, Emmanuel Gadaix wrote:
> >>>Someone was asking about comparing HP and Solaris architecture.
> >>>You can have a look at
> >>They asked for a comparison, not advertising drivel, didn't they?
> >>My experience: Go with Sun. Simply better design, better support, simply
> >Wes Kaufmann
> >mailto:wes @
Phone: (212) 593-0689 mailto:Me @
Fax: (212) 832-7502 http://WWW.DannyGumport.com