Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(September 1994)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: RFD: comp.mail.list-admin.{policy,software}
From: Brent Chapman <brent @ mycroft . GreatCircle . COM>
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 1994 08:59:54 -0700
To: David Barr <barr @ pop . psu . edu>
Cc: list-managers @ greatcircle . com, majordomo-users @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to: Your message of Fri, 9 Sep 1994 00:16:26 -0400
Reply-to: list-managers @ greatcircle . com

First, cross-posted calls for discussion are bad.  You should have
posted the message to each list separately, or better yet chosen or
created _one_ list for followup discussions and directed everybody
there.

Therefore, I suggest List-Managers@GreatCircle.COM as the discussion
forum for this topic, and have set the "Reply-To:" of this message to
that list.

David Barr <barr@pop.psu.edu> writes:

# comp.mail.list-admin.policy
# 	This group is for policy discussions involved in running a
# mailing list.  This includes but is not limited to moderation policies,
# dealing with trouble users, privacy issues of sensitive lists, and
# policy issues involved with gating mailing lists into other media such
# as Usenet.  This group is not for the announcement of new mailing lists.

This falls within the charter of the List-Managers mailing list.  I
don't think that a newsgroup is warranted by either subscribership
(482 people between List-Managers and List-Managers-Digest) or volume
(so far this year, anywhere from 20 to 175 message/month, averaging
only about 85 messages/month).

# comp.mail.list-admin.software
# 	This group is for discussions involved with the selection,
# installation, and operation of software used to manage mailing lists.
# Discussion of the mail transport agents sendmail or smail should be
# held in comp.mail.sendmail or comp.mail.smail.  This group is not for
# the announcement of new mailing lists.

This falls partially within the charter of List-Managers (when it's
discussion of generic software issues, comparisons of various list
management programs, and so forth), and partially within the charters
of the various package-specific mailing lists (for instance,
Majordomo-Users and Majordomo-Workers).  Again, I don't think that a
newsgroup is warranted by either subscribership or volume.

There's little enough discussion of these topics as is; why dilute it
further by splitting it between the existing mailing lists and new
newsgroups?


-Brent
--
Brent Chapman         | Great Circle Associates  | Call or email for info about
Brent@GreatCircle.COM | 1057 West Dana Street    | upcoming Internet Security 
+1 415 962 0841       | Mountain View, CA  94041 | Firewalls Tutorial dates

Indexed By Date Previous: Re: RFD: comp.mail.list-admin.{policy,software}
From: berg@pool.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE (Stephen R. van den Berg)
Next: Re: RFD: comp.mail.list-admin.{policy,software}
From: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: RFD: comp.mail.list-admin.{policy,software}
From: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>
Next: Re: RFD: comp.mail.list-admin.{policy,software}
From: Info-LabVIEW List Maintainer <info-labview-request@pica.army.mil>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com