Reply to: RE>>getting list mgrs attention
> First of all, fix your mailer! It should not be sending bounce messages to
> the errors-to line, it should be sending them to the return address from
the
> SMTP envelope! Errors-to is not only non-standard, it is broken (as you
have
> discovered).
really? It seems at least anti-social to bounce a message back to either the
list (Reply-to:) or the original message poster (From:) if some subscriber
acct has been deleted. Neither the poster nor the other list subscribers
could possibly care or be in any position to do anything. Only the list
manager could have any reasonable interest in non-delivery messages. In this
particular message, the possible reply addresses are From, Reply-to, and
Errors-to. Only Errors-to seems remotely appropriate as bounce destination.
Am I missing something here?
Follow-Ups:
|
|
