Michael Berch writes:
>In this case, I think it is absolutely mandatory that the provider
>communicate with the list manager on a regular basis (twice a year?)
>with at least the following information (paraphrased):
[ excellent suggestions clipped ]
Thanks very much for the suggestions, and I'll take them into consideration fo
r revising our biennial verification process.
>Unfortunately, even though I maintain 5 relatively high-profile lists
>(one of which, ironically, is list-managers) and one smaller (but
>public) list, nobody from AOL has ever communicated with me in the
>way suggested above. I have no idea which of my lists, if any, are
>in AOL's database, or what information is about them there.
If you haven't heard from us by now, you're not in the database. I can't find
any matches on your name in the database or on any portion of your e-mail
address. If you'd like to be listed, please let me know in private mail and
I'll be happy to work with you. (Remember, unless your list has been noted on
NEW-LIST in the past year or one of our members has brought it to our
attention and you've been contacted, we don't have it.)
--David O'Donnell
|
|