Graham Spencer <graham@atext.com> writes:
>
> merchant@anuxv.att.com (s.merchant) said:
>
> > 1. They had a single address for *everything* !!?!!
>
> Yes, I agree that this looked unprofessional. We should have specified
> a separate address for the human in charge of the project. However, as
Well, you guys still seem to be at it, expecting responses to hosts
which cannot be accessed at your site. A recent example at an attempt
to get subscription information from one of my lists....When the server
sent the information blurb, guess what?
Received: from toast.eushc.org (toast.eushc.org [163.246.96.100])
by sunshine.eushc.org (8.6.10/EUSHC) with ESMTP
id DAA10713; Sat, 5 Aug 1995 03:33:38 -0400
----- The following addresses had delivery problems -----
<list@cochese.atext.com> (unrecoverable error)
----- Transcript of session follows -----
<list@cochese.atext.com>... Deferred: No route to host
-------------------------------------------------------------------
GeSS
--
Gess Shankar |<><>|Internet: gess@knex.mind.ORG |<><>|
Knowledge Exchange|<><>|::::::::::::<scientia est potentia>:::::::::::::|<><>|
Follow-Ups:
References:
|
|
