> > You have been since informed properly, several times, and well before your
> > posting to n.a.n-a.m. Hence it appears to me that you are choosing not to
>
> Not true. I posted to n.a.n-a.m. after receiving your first response. It
> may have taken a while to show up at your site (that's the nature of news
> distribution), but it was most definitely posted to that newsgroup and to
> list-managers after your first, initial reply to me and at a time I
> figured I wasn't going to go any further with this with you. After
> mulling it over for a while I decided to try some further (and fruitless)
> dialog with you.
I stand corrected, and I publicly apologize for my incorrect information.
May I assume, now, that you are sufficiently clear on the details of this
issue, or is any further clarification necessary so you might soon stop
plastering my name all over creation?
I really don't care -- and I'm sorry if that offends anyone -- if the list
admins of the world disagree with my basis for these postings. I'm not
asking for everyone to agree with me -- I'm not even asking everyone to
disagree with me, that was the purpose of your postings all over creation,
not mine.
If anyone is so concerned with keeping score, you can chalk up a "bully rah
rah" for Ms. Close, as I've said before, after this one incident in her own
cherished newsgroup, we will not ever commit such a heinous crime ever
again.
However, this is indeed only half a point in her favor, since I intend to
continue this horrible abusive behaviour in the other newsgroup where such
previous violent abuses of Usenet have been quite well-received.
Joe
--
Joe George (jgeorge@nbi.com, jgeorge@crl.com) |Even I don't always
"Oh Bother," said Pooh, and quietly erased his hard disk.|agree with my own
|opinions. Nobody
(Please don't use 'jgeorge@twiglet.nbi.com' anymore.) |else does either.
References:
|
|
