Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(August 1995)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Standardization of bounce messages considered desirable
From: Michelle Dick <artemis @ rahul . net>
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 95 21:52:13 -0700
To: list-managers @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to: <9508262327.AA08137@postmodern.com>

Michael wrote:
> 
> At this point it would take some serious hacking to be able to deal
> with the variety of bounce formats; even the most common format
> (sendmail) has enough version differences that it would be tough to parse.

True enough, but SmartList, for one, already has this "serious
hacking" included.  By my estimate it catches about 95% of the bounces
and is one of the major reasons I use it (with a 2,000-member list, I
get a lot of bounces and handling them manually was a major time-sink
I am exceedingly happy to be relieved of).

Still, standardized bounces are very desirable -- it would further
improve the bounce-handling possibilities and reduce the processing
needed (a not-so-minor issue since most of the incoming list mail is
typically bounces).

Doesn't listserv also do some bounce handling?

--
Michelle Dick       artemis@rahul.net       East Palo Alto, CA
          Owner, FATFREE Vegetarian Mailing List


References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Standardization of bounce messages considered desirable
From: meo@schoneal.com (Miles O'Neal)
Next: Re: Standardization of bounce messages considered desirable
From: Bob Snyder <rsnyder@janet.advsys.com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Standardization of bounce messages considered desirable
From: mcb@postmodern.com (Michael C. Berch)
Next: Microsoft SMTP gateway problems (resolved)
From: Chuck Tomasi <ctomasi@Plexus.COM>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com