Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(February 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Horror Story - is there a defense?
From: Jerry Peek <jerry @ ora . com>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1996 05:58:45 -0800
To: list-managers @ greatcircle . com
References: <0099E106.B8133762.22@sacto.mp.usbr.gov><199602180611.WAA21630@lunch.engr.sgi.com>

On 17 February, "Henry W. Miller" <henrym@sacto.mp.usbr.gov> wrote:
> > From:	MX%"jerry@ora.com" 17-FEB-1996 09:28:05.11
> > Listproc 6.0 (and probably later versions) do a few things to stop
> > your problem of duplicate messages going to a list:
> > 
> > - it keeps the last 500 (I think) Message-IDs sent to each list, and
> >   also sent to listproc itself (administrative requests). ...
> > 
> > - it computes a checksum of each message body sent to a list.
> >   When a new message comes in, it compares the checksum to the last 500
> >   checksums ...
> 
> 	This would assume, of course, that the rogue mailer kept 
> generating the same message-id for each message.  If not, then there 
> would still be trouble...

On 17 February, close@lunch.engr.sgi.com (Diane Barlow Close) wrote:
> You could always strip out the headers and do a body checksum...

Sorry if I wasn't clear.  That's what listproc does when it computes
that checksum I mentioned.  (I think it also strips trailing whitespace
from each line of the body before it calculates the checksum... in case
some gateway/etc. has added whitespace to the original message body.)

--Jerry, jerry@ora.com


Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Lsoft's Listserv VS. Listproc???
From: "Roger Fajman" <RAF@CU.NIH.GOV>
Next: Re: Horror Story - is there a defense?
From: tasos@cs.bu.edu (Anastasios Kotsikonas)
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Horror Story - is there a defense?
From: close@lunch.engr.sgi.com (Diane Barlow Close)
Next: Re: Horror Story - is there a defense?
From: tasos@cs.bu.edu (Anastasios Kotsikonas)

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com