On Sun, 1 Dec 1996, Paul Graham wrote:
> perhaps you have some vested interest in lyris. we do not. we will not
> accrue any benefit.
>
> -------- In reply to:
> This is no test market. This is an exchange of ideas about software
> design. We are the beneficiaires of any smart changes which occur as a
> result.
My point, if not already clear, was that this dialogue compares the
technical functions and flaws of a variety of mail mangement programs,
including Lyris.
Smart changes made to Lyris or any other program it competes with as a
result of such detailed discussion benefits anyone using those programs,
and aids many of us in evaluating and managing software and lists we now
have. People have sent me private mail mentioning that this has been
educational for them, and touched on points of importance which are new
to them.
I don't have any interest in Lyris stock. I don't know anyone there
except John Buckman based upon one phone call to the company. I've had
more contact and general interest in the Lsoft product.
I'm careful enough to value open discussion about competing products
among others who know and care about this stuff a lot.
There is no reason to hassle me for merely seeking perspectives on these
products, and for mentioning the value of positive diaogue between
vendors and customers in general.
James Cook
Follow-Ups:
References:
|
|
