Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(December 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Lyris
From: Eric Thomas <ERIC @ VM . SE . LSOFT . COM>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 1996 10:47:49 +0100
To: list-managers-owner @ GreatCircle . COM, Dave Crocker <dcrocker @ brandenburg . com>
Cc: Jeff Wasilko <jeffw @ smoe . org>, John Buckman <jbuckman @ shelby . com>, Chip Rosenthal <chip @ unicom . com>, list-managers @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: Message of Sun, 1 Dec 1996 17:42:57 -0800 (PST) from list-managers-owner@GreatCircle.COM

On   Sun,    1   Dec   1996    17:42:57   -0800   (PST)    Dave   Crocker
<dcrocker@brandenburg.com> said:

>        well, saving on the number of connection setups DOES count.

Fine, but  name a "high end"  MTA that doesn't  do that. It's a  bit like
touting the presence  of airbags in your luxury car;  they all have that.
When comparing MTAs, you wouldn't even mention connection reuse unless it
were absent in one of the products being tested.

>        it occurs to me that the counter to some of our complaints about
>one message per receipient is that many lists have little aggregation by
>domain or host,

That's not  true. There is  massive aggregation to domains  like AOL.COM,
which also account for a large fraction  of the user base of most mailing
lists.

  Eric

Indexed By Date Previous: Re: aggregate delivery
From: "John Buckman" <jbuckman@shelby.com>
Next: Re: Re[4]: Lyris
From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@itw.com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Re[6]: Lyris
From: David Lloyd-Jones <dlj@inforamp.net>
Next: Re: Lyris
From: Deb <indigo@clark.net>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com