>In reference to the subject lines of
> Subject
> Re: Subject
> Re[2]: Subject
> Re[4]: Subject
> Re: Re[4]: Subject
>which mailer is responsible for the abomination of adding "[n]" after "Re:"?
>
>Isn't there an RFC that states "thou shalt not change 'Re:' to anything else"?
I think it's a BBS called First Class by SoftArc. I recall long arguments
with their developers on USENET a few years ago about this very issue.
They were arrogant and basically said they were right and the rest of the
world was wrong.
Cheers,
Rob
.....................................................................
Robert S. Mah Internet Presence 212-366-0881
Managing Director and Consulting Services rmah@angel.net
http://www.angel.net/
Follow-Ups:
References:
|
|
