Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(December 1996)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Aggregating on MX records
From: Brad Knowles <brad @ his . com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 1996 00:11:38 -0500
To: "John Buckman" <jbuckman @ shelby . com>, meo @ schoneal . com (Miles O'Neal)
Cc: dcrocker @ brandenburg . com, list-managers @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <199612012104.VAA19087@synergy.transbay.net>

At 3:54 PM -0500 12/1/1996, John Buckman wrote:

>Perhaps someone can answer this question: do DNS servers cache MX
>records?  Obviously, most DNS servers cache hostname->IP lookups, but
>I was wondering if they cached MX entries as well.

	Yup.  This is a standard feature of BIND.

>Or, are there any mailers (or patched mailers) which cache MX
>records?  It seems like an obvious place to increase efficiency,
>especially with busy mailing lists, so I'd be suprised if some mailer
>(MTA) didn't do this.

	I believe that sendmail already does this.  That's why it takes
so long when starting up queue runners, especially in
"SortOrder=host" mode with version 8.7 sendmail.  As I recall, Dan
Bernstein seems to think that doing something like this is a "bad
idea", and in qmail makes his goal the fastest possible start up of
queue runners without any pre-lookup at all.  Blech.

--
Brad Knowles,                                  MIME/PGP: brad@his.com
    comp.mail.sendmail FAQ Maintainer     <http://www.his.com/~brad/>
        finger brad@his.com for my PGP Public Keys and Geek Code
The comp.mail.sendmail FAQ is at <http://www.his.com/~brad/sendmail/>




Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: list performance metrics
From: Brad Knowles <brad@his.com>
Next: Re: Large Mailing Lists
From: Bonnie Scott <bonnie@staff.prodigy.com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Aggregating on MX records
From: "John Buckman" <jbuckman@shelby.com>
Next: Re: Aggregating on MX records
From: Paul Graham <pjg@urth.acsu.buffalo.edu>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com