Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(December 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: An alternative to spamming?
From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui @ plaidworks . com>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 1997 18:28:25 -0800
To: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg @ monkeys . com>, "Gary E. Bickford" <garyb @ outlawnet . com>
Cc: List-Managers @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <9442.881185610@monkeys.com>
References: Your message of Wed, 03 Dec 1997 12:54:54 -0600. <v03102803b0ab583b61b2@[163.185.152.110]>

At 1:46 PM -0800 12/3/97, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:

> The rules are very simple.  There is no ambiguity.  There is no
>``grey area''.
> There is no such thing as being ``a little pregnant''. You either are or
> you aren't.  Likewise for being a bandwidth theif.

Oh, yes there is. Everyone draws their lines in different places in the
sand. Just watch out drawing lines near a zealot.... (grin)



--
         Chuq Von Rospach (chuq@apple.com) Apple IS&T Mail List Gnome
                 <http://www.solutions.apple.com/ListAdmin/>

 Plaidworks Consulting (chuqui@plaidworks.com) <http://www.plaidworks.com/>
   (<http://www.plaidworks.com/hockey/> +-+ The home for Hockey on the net)





References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Clueless subscribers?
From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>
Next: Re: Clueless subscribers?
From: Vince Sabio <vince@humournet.com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: An alternative to spamming?
From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@monkeys.com>
Next: Re: An alternative to spamming?
From: Dave Voorhis <dave@armchair.mb.ca>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com