>>>>> "GK" == Gillam Kerley <gkerley@execpc.com> writes:
GK> Can anyone explain why the *list-managers* list, of all lists, does
GK> this?
The message triggered an administrivia filter and had to be approved by the
list owner.
GK> Shouldn't the list-managers list, having access to the sum total of all
GK> of the list-management talent out there in cyberland, be the list
GK> *least* likely to do strange things like this?
Who can say? The nature of the subscribers doesn't make any difference;
it still requires the free time of a list owner.
- J<
References:
|
|
