You didn't give enough info to really point out where a problem
may be in your getting those posts. Your message arrived today,
and it appears that the greatcircle machines were the source of the
delay.
>Received: from honor.greatcircle.com by relay4.UU.NET with ESMTP
> (peer crosschecked as: honor.greatcircle.com [198.102.244.44])
> id SRdvoh29985; Fri, 26 Dec 1997 02:53:02 -0500 (EST)
>Received: (majordom@localhost) by honor.greatcircle.com (8.8.5/Honor-Lists-970926-1) id XAA27264; Thu, 25 Dec 1997 23:21:39 -0800 (PST)
>Received: (mcb@localhost) by honor.greatcircle.com (8.8.5/Honor-971021-1) id XAA27249 for list-managers@greatcircle.com; Thu, 25 Dec 1997 23:21:36 -0800 (PST)
>Received: from mailgw02.execpc.com (mailgw02.execpc.com [169.207.16.10]) by honor.greatcircle.com (8.8.5/Honor-971021-1) with ESMTP id AAA24622 for <list-managers@GreatCircle.COM>; Tue, 23 Dec 1997 00:21:12 -0800 (PST)
--Gene
Gillam Kerley made the following keystrokes:
>Chuq Von Rospach wrote:
>
>
>What's important is not what he wrote but when he wrote it and when I
>received it.
>
>This post was dated 12/16, and I just received it (and another
>list-managers post by Dave Wolfe on the same thread) in the wee hours of
>12/23. Other lists I subscribe to (and there are now more than a dozen)
>get messages to my mailbox within a few minutes to a few hours.
>
>Can anyone explain why the *list-managers* list, of all lists, does
>this? Is it doing this to everyone, or just to me? (After all, just
>because I'm paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get me.) ;-)
>
>Shouldn't the list-managers list, having access to the sum total of all
>of the list-management talent out there in cyberland, be the list
>*least* likely to do strange things like this?
>
>GK
>
>
References:
|
|
