Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(March 1999)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Introduction / Questions
From: Nick Simicich <njs @ scifi . squawk . com>
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 1999 17:57:21 -0500
To: Jeremy Blackman <loki @ maison-otaku . net>
Cc: list-managers @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.3.95.990309123244.2342n-100000@godai.maison-otaku.net>
References: <3.0.5.32.19990309145216.03a1cda0@127.0.0.1>

At 12:35 PM 3/9/99 -0800, Jeremy Blackman wrote:
>> >* Built-in sorting on domain, for the outgoing user list.  A good thing,
>> >  or a bad thing?  It tends to REALLY improve sendmail's performance, but
>> 
>> Why is it ever bad?  Because the sort for large lists represents a memory
>> usage bubble?  In my case, I don't think it would matter.
>
>Exactly.  The majority of qsort implementations are not the most memory
>efficient in the situation of large lists.  For a list of 2,000, it
>doesn't matter.  For a list of 20,000, it starts to hurt.  On the other
>hand, a list of 20,000 is where it could also do a lot of good, on a
>sendmail platform...

Why not do a merge/bubble sort into the sorted list during the subscribe
operation and then just use the pre-sorted list when a posting happens?
--
That which does not kill us, makes us stronger.
That which does kill us makes us smell stronger, after a few days, anyway.
Nick Simicich mailto:njs@scifi.squawk.com or (last choice)
mailto:njs@us.ibm.com
http://scifi.squawk.com/njs.html -- Stop by and Light Up The World!


References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Introduction / Questions
From: Jeremy Blackman <loki@maison-otaku.net>
Next: Re: Light bulb joke (repeats again)
From: murr rhame <murr@vnet.net>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Introduction / Questions
From: Jeremy Blackman <loki@maison-otaku.net>
Next: Re: Introduction / Questions
From: Dave Sill <de5-list-managers@sws5.ctd.ornl.gov>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com