At 12:41 -0700 26 Oct 2000, Chuq Von Rospach <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> What I'd like to see happen, personally, is that we take list-id and
> extend it slightly by teaching clients the concept of
> "reply","reply-all" and "reply-list", where reply-list only works if
> list-id is set. that, I think, removes 99.9% of the arguments on BOTH
> sides of the "coerce reply-to" religious war....
Mutt already has all of those options, and it *is* quite nice.
Currently it needs to be told what addresses correspond to mailing
lists, and the list-reply command will look through the To: and Cc:
headers of the message to which you're replying for matching addresses
(so munging the To: header would break this). It would be even nicer if
it could happen automatically.
Aaron Schrab email@example.com http://www.execpc.com/~aarons/
Though I'll admit readability suffers slightly... --Larry Wall