Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(October 2000)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: [nanook@eskimo.com: Netzero.Net Cause Mail Problems]
From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui @ plaidworks . com>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 17:38:50 -0800
To: Rich Kulawiec <rsk @ magpage . com>, list-managers @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <20001030183902.B12186@gsp.org>
References: <20001030183902.B12186@gsp.org>

It's true. It's not all that new, BYU's done that forever.

he's considers it abuse for what reason? I find it irritating, but 
who says how long is too long to hold mail for delivery? three days? 
A week? a month? six?

bounces are bounces... (shrug)


At 6:39 PM -0500 10/30/00, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
>Spotted this on Usenet -- haven't seen this myself yet, but I've only
>got a handful of netzero.net folks on my lists, all of whom (I believe)
>are actively reading their mail.



>  >      Netzero has apparently implimented a brilliant policy of 
>bouncing e-mail
>  > that sits in a netzero mailbox for more than six months.

-- 
Chuq Von Rospach - Plaidworks Consulting (mailto:chuqui@plaidworks.com)
Apple Mail List Gnome (mailto:chuq@apple.com)

Be just, and fear not.



Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: [nanook@eskimo.com: Netzero.Net Cause Mail Problems]
From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@magpage.com>
Next: Re: [nanook@eskimo.com: Netzero.Net Cause Mail Problems]
From: "Michael S. Johnson" <michj@eskimo.com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: [nanook@eskimo.com: Netzero.Net Cause Mail Problems]
From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@magpage.com>
Next: Re: [nanook@eskimo.com: Netzero.Net Cause Mail Problems]
From: "Michael S. Johnson" <michj@eskimo.com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com