Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(December 2000)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Is mailback validation still safe?
From: J C Lawrence <claw @ kanga . nu>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 10:34:45 -0800
To: Margaret Levine Young <margy @ gurus . com>
Cc: list-managers @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: Message from Margaret Levine Young <margy@gurus.com> of "Wed, 13 Dec 2000 10:21:38 EST." <4.1.20001213102046.00acf100@mail.iecc.com>
References: <4.1.20001212120815.00aeb820@mail.iecc.com> <4.1.20001213102046.00acf100@mail.iecc.com>

On Wed, 13 Dec 2000 10:21:38 -0500 
Margaret Levine Young <margy@gurus.com> wrote:

>> Actually, X moderator approved posts is safer than moderating new
>> subscritions for X days.  

> Yes, good point. Thanks! (We're probably moving our lists to
> MailMan, and I'll have to check whether it can handle that
> automagically.)

Currently it can't.  Rather under the covers I'm working on a
process queue based architecture proposal for Mailman v3 that
is/will be capable of this.

-- 
J C Lawrence                                       claw@kanga.nu
---------(*)                        : http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/
--=| A man is as sane as he is dangerous to his environment |=--



References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Is mailback validation still safe?
From: Margaret Levine Young <margy@gurus.com>
Next: How to get reply-all to work
From: Ellen Spertus <spertus@mills.edu>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Is mailback validation still safe?
From: Margaret Levine Young <margy@gurus.com>
Next: Re: Is mailback validation still safe?
From: Mike Nolan <nolan@celery.tssi.com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com