|
Subject: |
Re: AOL Terms -- Revealed |
|
From: |
Norbert Bollow <nb @
thinkcoach .
com> |
|
Date: |
Tue, 1 May 2001 09:11:19 +0200 |
|
To: |
list-managers @
GreatCircle .
COM |
|
In-reply-to: |
<p05010408b7132c61ef27@[209.220.42.148]> (message from Chuck Riceon Mon, 30 Apr 2001 07:59:00 -0700) |
|
Prefer-language: |
de, en, fr |
|
References: |
<Pine.BSI.4.05L.10104291324480.15569-100000@tom.iecc.com> <p05010408b7132c61ef27@[209.220.42.148]> |
> I do not like to see them drop messages anyway. There are ways to
> handle this. Since their system is so sophisticated, they could add
> code to bounce the first 500 and drop the rest of the bounces. On the
> 500th bounce, they could return a message to the postmaster of the
> site to indicate that messages were being lost due to excessive
> bounces. But silently dropping messages is wrong. -Chuck-
Yes. All automatically-generated messages should be
rate-limited, and there needs to be notification when the
rate-limiting kicks in. For each type of message, I think one
should have two limits: a per-recipient-mailbox limit and a
(much higher) per-recipent-domain-limit. This in an important
principle for everyone who implements an email robot, not just
for AOL.
Greetings, Norbert.
--
Norbert Bollow, Weidlistr.18, CH-8624 Gruet (near Zurich, Switzerland)
Tel +41 1 972 20 59 Fax +41 1 972 20 69 nb@thinkcoach.com
> Currently recruiting: Perl programmers and JSP (JavaServer Pages)
> programmers for the "Traffic Building Bulletin Board System" project
> at FreeDevelopers.Net ------------------> See http://tbbbs.org
|
|
