Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(May 2001)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists
From: Tim Pierce <twp @ rootsweb . com>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 10:50:31 -0400
To: Bernie Cosell <bernie @ fantasyfarm . com>
Cc: list-managers <list-managers @ GreatCircle . COM>
In-reply-to: <200105201400.f4KE0aw02967@mail.rev.net>; from bernie@fantasyfarm.com on Sun, May 20, 2001 at 10:00:35AM -0400
References: <3.0.3.32.20010519104844.020e8350@127.0.0.1>; <20010519221512.H66420@ma-1.rootsweb.com> <200105201400.f4KE0aw02967@mail.rev.net>
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 10:00:35AM -0400, Bernie Cosell wrote:
> On 19 May 2001, at 22:15, Tim Pierce wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 10:48:44AM -0400, Nick Simicich wrote:
> > > 
> > > There are no legit virus notifications, except the ones that come from
> > > virus companies.
> > 
> > That's kind of the attitude I'm taking these days.  If I thought
> > that we could instruct the users how to tell a warning of a real
> > virus from a bogus rumor, then we would pursue that.
> 
> But *what* are you _warning_ them about?

Nothing.  We don't permit attachments to be posted to mailing lists.

> Why not just send them a constant stream of "there are still zillions of 
> email viruses afoot, don't open attachments"?

Because I don't believe it's our job.  We don't allow attachments,
we don't allow executable content, and we block most virus warnings.
End of story.  I don't want virus hysteria to distract me from
doing my job.




References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Fw: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists
From: "William Silvert" <wsilvert@ipimar.pt>
Next: Re: Fw: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists
From: Nick Simicich <njs@scifi.squawk.com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists
From: Charlie Summers <charlie@lofcom.com>
Next: Re: Spam Filters vs. Mailing Lists
From: Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com