On 28 May 2001, at 11:24, JC Dill wrote:
> On 08:16 AM 5/28/01, David W. Tamkin wrote:
>
> >Blind faith in reply-to-all to do the right thing magically without the
> >user's reviewing its choices is not perfect either. We agree that no mail
> >client has a "read my mind, know all of netiquette, know the list rules,
> >predict the text I plan to type, know the preferences of the poster to whom
> >I'm replying, and figure out the exact right way to address my response"
> >command.
>
> Hmmm. It seems we have an opportunity to write an RFC that would spec a
> "reply-to-list" header and a "reply-to-author" header, and discuss how to
> implement selection of these two reply options in common email
> clients.
Gee, and you could call one of those 'reply' and the other 'followup' and
almost have reinvented News... :o)
/Bernie\
--
Bernie Cosell Fantasy Farm Fibers
mailto:bernie@fantasyfarm.com Pearisburg, VA
--> Too many people, too few sheep <--
References:
|
|
