Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(August 2003)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: list policies about vacation programs
From: "David W. Tamkin" <dattier @ panix . com>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 18:05:25 -0500
To: listmanagers <list-managers @ greatcircle . com>
References: <Pine.OSX.4.56.0308131028470.516@betty.goldmark.private> <6.0.0.10.0.20030813075308.046d67a0@127.0.0.1> <6.0.0.10.0.20030813075308.046d67a0@127.0.0.1> <4.3.2.7.2.20030813174412.0308dd20@mail.rixlists.net>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0

Rick wrote,

> I spoke with one systems administrator who said that my messages were
> being received with PRECEDENCE=NORMAL, and the sysadmin uses that to
> gauge who gets an auto-responder.

So despite all the other indicators, such as having List- headers, 
coming from an envelope sender address that includes the string "owner" 
or "request" or "bounce" or "errors" or "admin," and most significantly 
the absence of the user's address from the To: line, the autoresponder 
was still allowed to yak away, and the administrator's excuse was that 
[s]he has decided unilaterally that only one criterion counts?

I sent my stuff out with Precedence: list, so if that had happened on 
any of my lists I would never have known.  But if I found out I'd have 
certainly given that admin the URL to Jeff's rant.



Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: list policies about vacation programs
From: Jeffrey Goldberg <jeffrey@goldmark.org>
Next: Re: list policies about vacation programs
From: JC Dill <inet-list@vo.cnchost.com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: list policies about vacation programs
From: Jeffrey Goldberg <jeffrey@goldmark.org>
Next: Re: list policies about vacation programs
From: Jeffrey Goldberg <jeffrey@goldmark.org>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com