Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(September 1992)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: cisco ``established'' keyword
From: jonl @ hal . com (frederick smythe, esquire)
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 92 15:34:50 PDT
To: firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM

some workmates of mine at another site have reported specific
cases of a bug in the CISCO established keyword which does not
make it an alternative to use, as wonderful as it would be :}

i'm sending this message separately from my other reply which
is a more general issue and thought this should be pointed out
separately.




Indexed By Date Previous: Re: none + some VS all - some
From: sidney @ borland . com (Sidney Markowitz)
Next: Re: none + some VS all - some
From: smb @ ulysses . att . com
Indexed By Thread Previous: Apologies...
From: steve @ wattres . SJ . CA . US (Steve Watt -- KD6GGD)
Next: SUMMARY: Why allow incoming telnet?
From: lemke @ MITL . COM (Kennedy Lemke)

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com