Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(December 1992)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Notes from Firewalls BOF at USENIX LISA Conference
From: smb @ research . att . com
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 92 11:39:21 EST
To: Brent Chapman <brent @ GreatCircle . COM>
Cc: Firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM

	 I haven't looked at NTP yet; none of the clients I've set up firewalls
	 for have requested it.  If it uses a random port for one end of the
	 connection, I don't see any safe way to let NTP traffic through a
	 firewall that only looks at destination addresses; if you do, you'll
	 also end up exposing all RPC-based services, like YP and so forth.

The essential use of ntp -- keeping time synchronization -- uses port 123
on both ends.  But other uses -- queries to remote time servers, or
forcing the right time when rebooting -- use random inside ports.


Indexed By Date Previous: packet filter metalanguage
From: Bob Sutterfield <bob @ MorningStar . Com>
Next: Re: Notes from Firewalls BOF at USENIX LISA Conference
From: Mike Minnich <minnich @ wind . es . dupont . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Notes from Firewalls BOF at USENIX LISA Conference
From: Mike Minnich <minnich @ wind . es . dupont . com>
Next: Re: Notes from Firewalls BOF at USENIX LISA Conference
From: Brent Chapman <brent @ GreatCircle . COM>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com