Firewalls: Re: Sun sendmail vulnerability

Firewalls
(October 1993)

Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject:	Re: Sun sendmail vulnerability
From:	Leland K. Neely <lkn @ llnl . gov>
Date:	Fri, 22 Oct 93 9:25:14 PDT
To:	Dan . Farmer @ corp . sun . com, rens @ imsi . com
Cc:	firewalls @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to:	<9310221531 . AA05805 @ death . corp . sun . com>; from "Dan . Farmer @ corp . sun . com" at Oct 22, 93 8:31 am
Mailer:	Elm [revision: 70.85]

Guys-
Flame on:
Please refrain from disclosing bug particulars on an email list.

All we need is to have hackers get the inside poop on a hole faster
than we can patch it.

etc. etc.....

Flame off.

I know you are trying to understand the vulnerability, but please consider
the (potential) audience when asking such questions.

Cheers!
Lee
lkn @
 llnl .
 gov

Follow-Ups:

Re: Sun sendmail vulnerability
From: Brad Huntting <huntting @ advtech . uswest . com>
Re: Sun sendmail vulnerability
From: woods @ ncar . UCAR . EDU (Greg Woods)
Re: Sun sendmail vulnerability
From: Tom Fitzgerald <fitz @ wang . com>
Re: Sun sendmail vulnerability
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <pmetzger @ lehman . com>

References:

Re: Sun sendmail vulnerability
From: Dan . Farmer @ Corp . Sun . COM

Indexed By Date	Previous:	Re: Sun sendmail vulnerability From: Dan . Farmer @ Corp . Sun . COM
Indexed By Date	Next:	Re: sendmail and CERT From: "Perry E. Metzger" <pmetzger @ lehman . com>
Indexed By Thread	Previous:	Re: Sun sendmail vulnerability From: Dan . Farmer @ Corp . Sun . COM
Indexed By Thread	Next:	Re: Sun sendmail vulnerability From: "Perry E. Metzger" <pmetzger @ lehman . com>