Firewalls: Re: Crack'ified npasswd

Firewalls
(February 1994)

Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject:	Re: Crack'ified npasswd
From:	Brad Huntting <huntting @ advtech . uswest . com>
Date:	Sat, 12 Feb 1994 22:10:40 -0700
To:	"Paul Pomes" <paul @ uxc . cso . uiuc . edu>
Cc:	Firewalls @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to:	Your message of "Sat, 12 Feb 1994 18:05:47 CST." <22119 . 761097964 @ uxc . cso . uiuc . edu>

> If my experience with folding CrackLib-2.5 into the CSO Nameserver package
> is any guide, adding the Crack rules makes a password checker too strict with
> insufficient feedback to the user.

This version of npasswd_boulder is pretty verbose when it rejects
a password.


brad

References:

Re: Crack'ified npasswd
From: "Paul Pomes" <paul @ uxc . cso . uiuc . edu>

Indexed By Date	Previous:	Re: Can you print from a chroot'd process? From: Icarus Sparry <I . Sparry @ ss1 . bath . ac . uk>
Indexed By Date	Next:	[no subject] From: Morten Hermanrud <Morten . Hermanrud @ ibmuio . uio . no>
Indexed By Thread	Previous:	Re: Crack'ified npasswd From: "Paul Pomes" <paul @ uxc . cso . uiuc . edu>
Indexed By Thread	Next:	Re: Crack'ified npasswd From: morgan @ engr . uky . edu (Wes Morgan)