Firewalls: Interlock : Opinions & Experiences?

Firewalls
(March 1994)

Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject:	Interlock : Opinions & Experiences?
From:	R . P . Handy @ ste0411 . wins . icl . co . uk
Date:	Thu, 17 Mar 1994 14:32:26 +0000
To:	firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
Original-encoded-information-types:	undefined (0)
X400-content-type:	P2-1984 (2)
X400-mts-identifier:	[/PRMD=icl/ADMD=gold 400/C=GB/;ste0411 0000042100002799]
X400-originator:	R . P . Handy @ ste0411 . wins . icl . co . uk
X400-received:	by mta relay1.pipex.net in /PRMD=pipex/ADMD=pipex/C=GB/; Relayed; Thu, 17 Mar 1994 14:37:23 +0000
X400-received:	by /PRMD=icl/ADMD=gold 400/C=GB/; converted (ia5 text (2)); Relayed; Thu, 17 Mar 1994 14:32:26 +0000
X400-recipients:	firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM

Hello, we are considering using the ANS Interlock product. Has
anyone had any experience with this system and have knowledge of
its reliability and security? Sorry if this is an FAQ, if so
where can I get the information?
 Thanks, Richard Handy   WINS Ltd
    r .
 p .
 handy @
 ste0411 .
 wins .
 icl .
 co .
 uk .

Indexed By Date	Previous:	RE: Telnet application gateway and VMS loginout.exe From: Thomas Hutton <hutton @ SDSC . EDU>
Indexed By Date	Next:	New RFC -- New reason for Application level firewalls From: "Robert G. Moskowitz" <0003858921 @ mcimail . com>
Indexed By Thread	Previous:	Firewalls loop fixed (I think) From: Brent Chapman <brent @ mycroft . GreatCircle . COM>
Indexed By Thread	Next:	New RFC -- New reason for Application level firewalls From: "Robert G. Moskowitz" <0003858921 @ mcimail . com>