Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(June 1994)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Re[2]: SMTP mail spoofing
From: dsmith @ isc . nva . ge . com
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 94 20:51:25 PDT
To: Frederick M Avolio <avolio @ tis . com>, Firewalls @ greatcircle . com

>
> X.400 does nothing to solve the problem being discussed.
>
>Fred
>

Short and sweet, but why are you saying this?

I have had several responses like this.  Let me know what you are thinking and I will
answer the concerns as best I can.

Note:  A lot of people associate Sprint Mail and AT&T mail with X.400.  While they are
X.400, they are poor examples.  X.400 should be run by the user organization, just like
SMTP.  The pieces are a little differnet though, and the security is more industrial
strength when done according to the standards.

-------------------------------------
Name: Dorian W Smith
E-mail: dsmith @
 isc .
 nva .
 ge .
 com (Dorian W Smith)
Date:  27 JUN 94
Time:  2155

This message was sent by Chameleon 
-------------------------------------




Follow-Ups:
Indexed By Date Previous: RE: Re[2]: SMTP mail spoofing
From: dsmith @ isc . nva . ge . com
Next: FireWal Vendor List
From: David Millett <73072 . 1663 @ CompuServe . COM>
Indexed By Thread Previous: RE: Re[2]: SMTP mail spoofing
From: dsmith @ isc . nva . ge . com
Next: Re: Re[2]: SMTP mail spoofing
From: Frederick M Avolio <avolio @ tis . com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com