From: bonomi @
delta .
eecs .
nwu .
edu (Robert Bonomi)
From: ericw @
fx .
com (Eric Wedaa)
I would like to suggest . . . A site gets put on the
list once it is reported to the list maintainer by root
at a site.
A site, once on the list, stays on the list until that
site is off the net. This is why the date field
exists.
I _don't_ like this part of the idea. How about 'number of
incidents in last 3 mo.', 'number of incidents in last 6 mo.',
'number of incidents in last year', and a site drops of the
list when there have been reports from less than two different
sites in the last year.
A major factor in how quickly a site expires from the list should be:
degree of cooperation you get from the sysadmin when a problem is
reported.
Furthermore: what's to keep a corrupt site from making bogus 'nuisance'
reports to the list maintainer?
-----
Fred Blonder fred @
nasirc .
hq .
nasa .
gov
Hughes STX Corp. (301) 441-4079
7701 Greenbelt Rd.
Greenbelt, Md. 20770
References:
|
|
