Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(September 1994)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Proposed Firewall Configuration
From: smb @ research . att . com
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 94 19:22:21 EDT
To: RAS @ cacdvax . cacd . rockwell . com
Cc: firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM, Larry_Chin @ cchtor . ca . cch . com

	 We thought that connecting each bastion host to the perimeter
	 network via a bridge would limit the traffic that could be
	 sniffed to just the traffic exchanged by the bastion host.
	 For example, if an intruder captured the anonymous ftp bastion
	 host and installed a sniffer, the intruder would not be able
	 to capture any SMTP traffic (which is handled by a different
	 bastion host).  We believe the bridges to be sufficient for
	 this purpose and do not understand how adding an additional
	 router on the perimeter network would achieve the same
	 affect.

Such bridges are a good idea.  Another possibility is to use a ``smart''
10BaseT hub.


Follow-Ups:
Indexed By Date Previous: RE: Eagle software from Concorde
From: David Pensak E-328/104 695-3650 <pensak @ esvax . dnet . dupont . com>
Next: Re: I hate DNS...
From: Ken Beames <webmaster @ qdeck . com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: RE: Eagle software from Concorde
From: David Pensak E-328/104 695-3650 <pensak @ esvax . dnet . dupont . com>
Next: Re: Proposed Firewall Configuration
From: "John P. Rouillard" <rouilj @ cs . umb . edu>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com