Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(October 1994)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: filters vs. dedicated firewall
From: Sean Goller <smg @ galt . com>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 1994 14:48:59 -0400 (EDT)
To: firewalls @ greatcircle . com


We are currently at the same decision point.

We've got a cisco which should be more than adequate for packet 
filtering. One of the issues is the fact that our business is providing 
information to the 'net. We must have as much security as possible, but 
without sacrificing our connectivity to the point that our service is 
unusable. Specifically, I don't think a firewall with a proxy HTTP server 
will help us at all, I think because of the performance issues it might 
actually be a loss.

I just can't see spending $20K+ for a machine that will effectively do 
what the cisco we already have can do. <shrug>

In cases like this, *is* there a clearcut benefit using a firewall 
machine as opposed to a router w/filtering? This is what I have to deal 
with. ;)

For a clearer understanding of the nature of the services we provide 
(this is for context only, not an advertisment), http://networth.galt.com/.

 -Sean Goller
 GALT Technologies, INC.



Follow-Ups:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Security INFO about Sendmail
From: matt @ uts . EDU . AU (Jas (Matthew K))
Next: NIC board six byte ids
From: padgett @ tccslr . dnet . mmc . com (A. Padgett Peterson, P.E. Information Security)
Indexed By Thread Previous: The Whitehouse
From: Bernard Robertson-Dunn <brd @ capcon . apana . org . au>
Next: Re: filters vs. dedicated firewall
From: Gregg Rosenberg <gregg @ interaccess . com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com