Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(November 1994)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Ohhhhhh Noooooooo
From: lavondes @ tidtest . total . fr (Michel Lavondes)
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 94 11:03:20 GMT
To: firewalls @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <199411022312 . SAA22996 @ cadman . cit . buffalo . edu>; from "Jeff Murphy" at Nov 2, 94 6:12 pm
Reply-to: lavondes @ tidtest . total . fr

Jeff Murphy wrote :
> 
> Michel Lavondes insists:
> >Nice to know that IPX/SPX networks are not the only ones Doom can bring to
> >their knees :-)
> 
> 	actually, it should be less of a pig on tcp since they wont be
> 	broadcasting like they did under ipx.

If you think about *machines* on the network being brought to their knees,
you're probably right. But what about the wire itself ? Not using broadcast
means thrice as many packets (assuming 4-players doom), plus tcp acks if
they're not piggybacked.
-- 
Michel Lavondes
E-Mail : lavondes @
 tidtest .
 total .
 fr
         lavondes%tidtest .
 total .
 fr @
 pegase .
 total .
 fr (if previous addr rejected)
Tel : +33-1-4135-4198
Fax : +33-1-4135-4189


Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: a great number of ports
From: hobbit @ bronze . lcs . mit . edu (*Hobbit*)
Next: Re: MAC spoofing by non-IP protocols
From: lavondes @ tidtest . total . fr (Michel Lavondes)
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Ohhhhhh Noooooooo
From: Jeff Murphy <jcmurphy @ cadman . cit . buffalo . edu>
Next: Re: Ohhhhhh Noooooooo
From: Jeff Murphy <jcmurphy @ cadman . cit . buffalo . edu>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com