Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(November 1994)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: sockd and the TIS fwtk on the same bastion?
From: criney1 @ abacus . tis . tandy . com (Chris Riney)
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 1994 10:34:43 -0600 (CST)
To: syskec @ panther . Gsu . EDU (Keith Campbell)
Cc: firewalls @ greatcircle . com, socks @ syl . dl . nec . com
In-reply-to: <199411111552 . KAA27218 @ panther . Gsu . EDU> from "Keith Campbell" at Nov 11, 94 10:52:04 am

> 
>    I've been thinking about trying to run both sockd and the TIS fwtk
> proxies on the same bastion host.  I could then offer socksified clients
> where its possible and the hosts that did'nt have such clients could
> still use the non-transparent TIS proxies.  I can't see any reason
> why it would'nt work.  Any commnts?
> 

Works fine together.  We use both for the same reasons (ms-dog applications are
a pain in the rear).
The TIS-fwtk alos provides a bit of security for incomming connections
as well.

>    Are there any routers that would be better suited as a screening 
> packet filter for a bastion host.  A manufactor that has a sensible
> filtering language and good performance for those filters.  Anybody
> have some recommendations?
> 




References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Telnet to SMTP problem
From: "Robertson, Paul" <proberts @ moc1 . gannett . com>
Next: Re: Finger Proxy (PROGRAM ENCLOSED!)
From: ajl @ Orion . MC . Duke . EDU (Arne J. Ludwig)
Indexed By Thread Previous: sockd and the TIS fwtk on the same bastion?
From: Keith Campbell <syskec @ panther . Gsu . EDU>
Next: Is the Sidewinder Challenge challenged?
From: "Mike O'Connor" <mjo @ dojo . mi . org>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com