Don Krapf wrote :
> > Michel Lavondes replied:
> > That's what I meant by "compromised router". Anyone heard of this being
> > doable/done for dedicated routers (ie not host-based) ?
> It wouldn't require what I think you mean by "compromised". Depending on
> the setup, suppose you just advertized a shorter route to the destination
So now the question becomes :
What steps can service providers or network admins take to shield their
routers from this kind of abuse, other than purely static routing ?
E-Mail : lavondes @
fr (if previous addr rejected)
Tel : +33-1-4135-4198
Fax : +33-1-4135-4189