Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(January 1995)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Q: Re: CISCO configuration - clairfication
From: lavondes @ tidtest . total . fr (Michel Lavondes)
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 95 20:50:29 GMT
To: wolfgang . kuehnel @ cp-nbg . philips . de (Wolfgang Kuehnel)
Cc: firewalls @ greatcircle . com (fw)
In-reply-to: <9501261238 . AA05560 @ sit03 . cp-nbg . philips . de>; from "Wolfgang Kuehnel" at Jan 26, 95 1:38 pm
Reply-to: lavondes @ tidtest . total . fr

Wolfgang Kuehnel wrote :
> 
> What appears new to me is the "in" in the  "ip access-group 101 in" line.
> Does that mean that Cisco supports packet screening/filtering for incoming
> packets?
> 
> In the manuals I have here (release 9.1 / september '92 / rather old) the
> ip access-group command does not have a qualifier "in" or "out".
> 

Yes, they do with 9.21 (use discouraged - you have to ask for it or ftp it
in yourself from CIO) and 10.x.
-- 
Michel Lavondes
E-Mail : lavondes @
 tidtest .
 total .
 fr
         lavondes%tidtest .
 total .
 fr @
 pegase .
 total .
 fr (if previous addr rejected)
Tel : +33-1-4135-4198
Fax : +33-1-4135-4189


References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: IP spoofing vs tcp wrappers and netacl
From: hue @ island . com (Pond Scum)
Next: How many & what is
From: padgett @ tccslr . dnet . mmc . com (A. Padgett Peterson, P.E. Information Security)
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Q: Re: CISCO configuration - clairfication
From: Howard Berkowitz <hcb @ clark . net>
Next: CD-Rom and firewall
From: padgett @ tccslr . dnet . mmc . com (A. Padgett Peterson, P.E. Information Security)

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com