Great Circle Associates Firewalls
(February 1995)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: IBM Firewall Solution
From: Quentin Fennessy <Quentin . Fennessy @ SEMATECH . Org>
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 1995 13:58:38 -0600
To: C Matthew Curtin <cmc @ brandx . cs . ohiou . edu>
Cc: firewalls @ greatcircle . com

Matthew-
    You asked "Wouldn't AIX be a good OS choice for a Unix-based firewall?"
(This is one question out of a 3 paragraph note, but it caught my eye)

I have the misfortune to use AIX for a UNIX based firewall.  But I won't 
do so again.  I keep running into flaws in networking and authentication
that drive me crazy.  The AIX login.cfg auth1 and auth2 facilities look
like great stuff, but are broken in practice.  This and other facilities
are poorly documented.

No, I don't think AIX is a good OS choice for a UNIX based firewall.
(Want to see my scars?)

Quentin

(OK, my next generation will be BSDI, or Plan9 -- what about Amoeba?)


Follow-Ups:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Firewall-1 and TCP Sequence Number Spoofing
From: z056716 @ uprc . com (LaCoursiere J. D. (Jeff))
Next: security from proxy-servers???
From: jon @ nytimes . com (Jon E. Price)
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: IBM Firewall Solution
From: mcr @ milkyway . com (Michael Richardson)
Next: Re: IBM Firewall Solution
From: devildog!grover @ uustar . starnet . net (grover davidson)

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com